Printable manual: brl.pdf (340Kb) or brl.dvi (204Kb) |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Starting with release 2.1.22, BRL includes Dorai Sitaram's `pregexp.scm' package, which provides support for Perl 5.x-style regular expressions. This chapter is taken from the documentation in that package.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
A regexp is a string that describes a pattern. A regexp matcher tries to match this pattern against (a portion of) another string, which we will call the text string. The text string is treated as raw text and not as a pattern.
Most of the characters in a regexp pattern are meant to
match occurrences of themselves in the text string.
Thus, the pattern "abc"
matches a string that
contains the characters a
, b
, c
in succession.
In the regexp pattern, some characters act as
metacharacters, and some character sequences act as
metasequences. That is, they specify something
other than their literal selves. For example, in the
pattern "a.c"
, the characters a
and c
do
stand for themselves but the metacharacter .
can match any character (other than
newline). Therefore, the pattern "a.c"
matches an a
, followed by any character,
followed by a c
.
If we needed to match the character .
itself,
we escape it, ie, precede it with a backslash
(\
). The character sequence \.
is thus a
metasequence, since it doesn't match itself but rather
just .
. So, to match a
followed by a literal
.
followed by c
, we use the regexp pattern
"a\\.c"
.(6)
Another example of a metasequence is \t
, which is a
readable way to represent the tab character.
We will call the string representation of a regexp the U-regexp, where U can be taken to mean Unix-style or universal, because this notation for regexps is universally familiar. Our implementation uses an intermediate tree-like representation called the S-regexp, where S can stand for Scheme, symbolic, or s-expression. S-regexps are more verbose and less readable than U-regexps, but they are much easier for Scheme's recursive procedures to navigate.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
`pregexp.scm' provides the user with the procedures
pregexp
, pregexp-match-positions
,
pregexp-match
, pregexp-replace
, and
pregexp-replace*
. All the identifiers introduced
by `pregexp.scm' have the prefix pregexp
, so they
are unlikely to clash with other names in Scheme,
including those of any natively provided regexp
operators.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The procedure pregexp
takes a U-regexp, which is a
string, and returns an S-regexp, which is a tree.
(pregexp "c.r") => (:sub (:or (:seq #\c :any #\r))) |
There is rarely any need to look at the S-regexps
returned by pregexp
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The procedure pregexp-match-positions
takes a
regexp pattern and a text string, and returns a
match if the pattern matches the text string.
The pattern may be either a U- or an S-regexp.
(pregexp-match-positions
will internally compile a
U-regexp to an S-regexp before proceeding with the
matching. If you find yourself calling
pregexp-match-positions
repeatedly with the same
U-regexp, it may be advisable to explicitly convert the
latter into an S-regexp once beforehand, using
pregexp
, to save needless recompilation.)
pregexp-match-positions
returns #f
if the pattern did not
match the string; and a list of index pairs if it
did match. Eg,
(pregexp-match-positions "brain" "bird") => #f (pregexp-match-positions "needle" "hay needle stack") => ((4 . 10)) |
In the second example, the integers 4 and 10 identify the substring that was matched. 1 is the starting (inclusive) index and 2 the ending (exclusive) index of the matching substring.
(substring "hay needle stack" 4 10) => "needle" |
Here, pregexp-match-positions
's return list contains only
one index pair, and that pair represents the entire
substring matched by the regexp. When we discuss
subpatterns later, we will see how a single match
operation can yield a list of submatches.
pregexp-match-positions
takes optional third
and fourth arguments that specify the indices of
the text string within which the matching should
take place.
(pregexp-match-positions "needle" "his hay needle stack -- my hay needle stack -- her hay needle stack" 24 43) => ((31 . 37)) |
Note that the returned indices are still reckoned relative to the full text string.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The procedure pregexp-match
is called like pregexp-match-positions
but instead of returning index pairs it returns the
matching substrings:
(pregexp-match "brain" "bird") => #f (pregexp-match "needle" "hay needle stack") => ("needle") |
pregexp-match
also takes optional third and
fourth arguments, with the same meaning as does
pregexp-match-positions
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The procedure pregexp-replace
replaces the
matched portion of the text string by another
string. The first argument is the regexp,
the second the text string, and the third
is the insert string (string to be inserted).
(pregexp-replace "te" "liberte" "ty") => "liberty" |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The procedure pregexp-replace*
replaces all
matches in the text string by the insert
string:
(pregexp-replace* "te" "liberte egalite fraternite" "ty") => "liberty egality fratyrnity" |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Here is a complete description of the regexp pattern
language recognized by the pregexp
procedures.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The assertions ^
and $
identify the
beginning and the end of the text string respectively.
They ensure that their adjoining regexps match at
one or other end of the text string.
Examples:
(pregexp-match-positions "^contact" "first contact") => #f |
The regexp fails to match because contact
does not
occur at the beginning of the text string.
(pregexp-match-positions "laugh$" "laugh laugh laugh laugh") => ((18 . 23)) |
The regexp matches the last laugh
.
The metasequence \b
asserts that
a word boundary exists.
(pregexp-match-positions "yack\\b" "yackety yack") => ((8 . 12)) |
The yack
in yackety
doesn't end at a word
boundary so it isn't matched. The second yack
does
and is.
The metasequence \B
has the opposite effect
to \b
. It asserts that a word boundary
does not exist.
(pregexp-match-positions "an\\B" "an analysis") => ((3 . 5)) |
The an
that doesn't end in a word boundary
is matched.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Typically a character in the regexp matches the same
character in the text string. Sometimes it is
necessary or convenient to use a regexp
metasequence to refer to a single character.
Thus, metasequences \n
, \r
, \t
, and \.
match the newline, return, tab and period characters
respectively.
The metacharacter period (.
) matches
any character other than newline.
(pregexp-match "p.t" "pet") => ("pet") |
It also matches pat
, pit
, pot
, put
,
and p8t
but not peat
or pfffft
.
A character class [
...]
matches any one
character from the set enclosed within the brackets.
Thus "p[aeiou]t"
matches pat
, pet
, pit
,
pot
, put
and nothing else.
Inside the brackets, a hyphen (-
) between two
characters specifies the ascii range between the characters.
Eg, "ta[b-dgn-p]"
matches tab
, tac
, tad
, and
tag
, and tan
, tao
, tap
.
An initial caret (^
) after the left bracket inverts
the set specified by the rest of the contents, ie, it
specifies the set of characters other than those
identified in the brackets. Eg, "do[^g]"
matches
all three-character sequences starting with do
except dog
.
Note that the metacharacter ^
inside brackets means
something quite different from what it means outside.
Most other metacharacters (.
, *
, +
, ?
,
etc) cease to be metacharacters when inside brackets,
although you may still escape them for peace of
mind. -
is a metacharacter only when it's
inside brackets.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Some standard character classes can be conveniently
represented as metasequences instead of as explicit
bracketed expressions. \d
matches a digit
([0-9]
); \s
matches a whitespace character; and
\w
matches a character that could be part of a
"word".(7)
The upper-case versions of these metasequences stand
for the inversions of the corresponding character
classes. Thus \D
matches a non-digit, \S
a
non-whitespace character, and \W
a
non-"word" character.
Remember to include a double backslash when putting these metasequences in a Scheme string:
(pregexp-match "\\d\\d" "0 dear, 1 have 2 read catch 22 before 9") => ("22") |
These character classes can be used inside
a bracketed expression. Eg,
"[a-z\\d]"
matches a lower-case letter
or a digit.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
A POSIX character class is a special metasequence of the form
[:
...:]
that can be used only inside a bracketed
expression. The POSIX classes supported are
[:alnum:]
[:alpha:]
[:algor:]
c
, h
, a
and d
[:ascii:]
[:blank:]
[:cntrl:]
<
32
[:digit:]
\d
[:graph:]
[:lower:]
[:print:]
[:space:]
\s
[:upper:]
[:word:]
\w
[:xdigit:]
For example, the regexp "[[:alpha:]_]"
matches a letter or underscore.
(pregexp-match "[[:alpha:]_]" "--x--") => ("x") (pregexp-match "[[:alpha:]_]" "--_--") => ("_") (pregexp-match "[[:alpha:]_]" "--:--") => #f |
The POSIX class notation is valid only inside a
bracketed expression. For instance, [:alpha:]
,
when not inside a bracketed expression, will not
be read as the letter class.
Rather it is (from previous principles) the character
class containing the characters :
, a
, l
,
p
, h
.
(pregexp-match "[:alpha:]" "--a--") => ("a") (pregexp-match "[:alpha:]" "--_--") => #f |
By placing a caret (^
) immediately after
[:
, you get the inversion of that POSIX
character class. Thus, [:^alpha]
is the class containing all characters
except the letters.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The quantifiers *
, +
, and
?
match respectively: zero or more, one or more,
and zero or one instances of the preceding subpattern.
(pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]*r" "cadaddadddr") => ((0 . 11)) (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]*r" "cr") => ((0 . 2)) (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]+r" "cadaddadddr") => ((0 . 11)) (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]+r" "cr") => #f (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]?r" "cadaddadddr") => #f (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]?r" "cr") => ((0 . 2)) (pregexp-match-positions "c[ad]?r" "car") => ((0 . 3)) |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
You can use braces to specify much finer-tuned quantification than is
possible with *
, +
, ?
.
The quantifier {m}
matches exactly m
instances of the preceding subpattern. m
must be a nonnegative integer.
The quantifier {m,n}
matches at least m
and at most n
instances. m
and
n
are nonnegative integers with m <=
n
. You may omit either or both numbers, in which case
m
defaults to 0 and n
to
infinity.
It is evident that +
and ?
are abbreviations
for {1,}
and {0,1}
respectively.
*
abbreviates {,}
, which is the same
as {0,}
.
(pregexp-match "[aeiou]{3}" "vacuous") => ("uou") (pregexp-match "[aeiou]{3}" "evolve") => #f (pregexp-match "[aeiou]{2,3}" "evolve") => #f (pregexp-match "[aeiou]{2,3}" "zeugma") => ("eu") |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The quantifiers described above are greedy, ie, they match the maximal number of instances that would still lead to an overall match for the full pattern.
(pregexp-match "<.*>" " |
To make these quantifiers non-greedy, append
a ?
to them. Non-greedy quantifiers match
the minimal number of instances needed to ensure an
overall match.
(pregexp-match "<.*?>" " |
The non-greedy quantifiers are respectively:
*?
, +?
, ??
, {m}?
, {m,n}?
.
Note the two uses of the metacharacter ?
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Clustering, ie, enclosure within parens
(
...)
, identifies the enclosed subpattern
as a single entity. It causes the matcher to capture
the submatch, or the portion of the string
matching the subpattern, in addition to the
overall match.
(pregexp-match "([a-z]+) ([0-9]+), ([0-9]+)" "jan 1, 1970") => ("jan 1, 1970" "jan" "1" "1970") |
Clustering also causes a following quantifier to treat the entire enclosed subpattern as an entity.
(pregexp-match "(poo )*" "poo poo platter") => ("poo poo " "poo ") |
The number of submatches returned is always equal to the number of subpatterns specified in the regexp, even if a particular subpattern happens to match more than one substring or no substring at all.
(pregexp-match "([a-z ]+;)*" "lather; rinse; repeat;") => ("lather; rinse; repeat;" " repeat;") |
Here the *
-quantified subpattern matches three
times, but it is the last submatch that is returned.
It is also possible for a quantified subpattern to
fail to match, even if the overall pattern matches.
In such cases, the failing submatch is represented
by #f
.
(define date-re ;match `month year' or `month day, year'. ;subpattern matches day, if present (pregexp "([a-z]+) +([0-9]+,)? *([0-9]+)")) (pregexp-match date-re "jan 1, 1970") => ("jan 1, 1970" "jan" "1," "1970") (pregexp-match date-re "jan 1970") => ("jan 1970" "jan" #f "1970") |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Submatches can be used in the insert string argument of the procedures
pregexp-replace
and pregexp-replace*
. The insert string can
use \n
as a backreference to refer back to the nth
submatch, ie, the substring that matched the nth subpattern.
\0
refers to the entire match, and it can also be specified as
\&
.
(pregexp-replace "_(.+?)_" "the _nina_, the _pinta_, and the _santa maria_" "*\\1*") => "the *nina*, the _pinta_, and the _santa maria_" (pregexp-replace* "_(.+?)_" "the _nina_, the _pinta_, and the _santa maria_" "*\\1*") => "the *nina*, the *pinta*, and the *santa maria*" ;recall: \S stands for non-whitespace character (pregexp-replace "(\\S+) (\\S+) (\\S+)" "eat to live" "\\3 \\2 \\1") => "live to eat" |
Use \\
in the insert string to specify a literal
backslash. Also, \$
stands for an empty string,
and is useful for separating a backreference \n
from an immediately following number.
Backreferences can also be used within the regexp
pattern to refer back to an already matched subpattern
in the pattern. \n
stands for an exact repeat
of the nth submatch.(8)
(pregexp-match "([a-z]+) and \\1" "billions and billions") => ("billions and billions" "billions") |
Note that the backreference is not simply a repeat of the previous subpattern. Rather it is a repeat of the particular substring already matched by the subpattern.
In the above example, the backreference can only match
billions
. It will not match millions
, even
though the subpattern it harks back to -- ([a-z]+)
--- would have had no problem doing so:
(pregexp-match "([a-z]+) and \\1" "billions and millions") => #f |
The following corrects doubled words:
(pregexp-replace* "(\\S+) \\1" "now is the the time for all good men to to come to the aid of of the party" "\\1") => "now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party" |
The following marks all immediately repeating patterns in a number string:
(pregexp-replace* "(\\d+)\\1" "123340983242432420980980234" "{\\1,\\1}") => "12{3,3}40983{24,24}3242{098,098}0234" |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
It is often required to specify a cluster (typically for quantification)
but without triggering the capture of submatch information. Such
clusters are called non-capturing. In such cases, use (?:
instead of (
as the cluster opener. In the following example,
the non-capturing cluster eliminates the "directory" portion of a
given pathname, and the capturing cluster identifies the basename.
(pregexp-match "^(?:[a-z]*/)*([a-z]+)$" "/usr/local/bin/mzscheme") => ("/usr/local/bin/mzscheme" "mzscheme") |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
The location between the ?
and the :
of a non-capturing
cluster is called a cloister.(9) You
can put modifiers there that will cause the enclustered
subpattern to be treated specially. The modifier i
causes the
subpattern to match case-insensitively:
(pregexp-match "(?i:hearth)" "HeartH") => ("HeartH") |
The modifier x
causes the subpattern to match
space-insensitively, ie, spaces and
comments within the
subpattern are ignored. Comments are introduced
as usual with a semicolon (;
) and extend till
the end of the line. If you need
to include a literal space or semicolon in
a space-insensitized subpattern, escape it
with a backslash.
(pregexp-match "(?x: a lot)" "alot") => ("alot") (pregexp-match "(?x: a \\ lot)" "a lot") => ("a lot") (pregexp-match "(?x: a \\ man \\; \\ ; ignore a \\ plan \\; \\ ; me a \\ canal ; completely )" "a man; a plan; a canal") => ("a man; a plan; a canal") |
The global variable *pregexp-comment-char*
contains the comment character (#\;
).
For Perl-like comments,
(set! *pregexp-comment-char* #\#) |
You can put more than one modifier in the cloister.
(pregexp-match "(?ix: a \\ man \\; \\ ; ignore a \\ plan \\; \\ ; me a \\ canal ; completely )" "A Man; a Plan; a Canal") => ("A Man; a Plan; a Canal") |
A minus sign before a modifier inverts its meaning.
Thus, you can use -i
and -x
in a
subcluster to overturn the insensitivities caused by an
enclosing cluster.
(pregexp-match "(?i:the (?-i:TeX)book)" "The TeXbook") => ("The TeXbook") |
This regexp will allow any casing for the
and book
but insists that TeX
not be
differently cased.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
You can specify a list of alternate subpatterns by separating them by `|'. The `|' separates subpatterns in the nearest enclosing cluster (or in the entire pattern string if there are no enclosing parens).
(pregexp-match "f(ee|i|o|um)" "a small, final fee") => ("fi" "i") (pregexp-replace* "([yi])s(e[sdr]?|ing|ation)" "it is energising to analyse an organisation pulsing with noisy organisms" "\\1z\\2") => "it is energizing to analyze an organization pulsing with noisy organisms" |
(?:
instead of (
.
(pregexp-match "f(?:ee|i|o|um)" "fun for all") => ("fo") |
An important thing to note about alternation is that the leftmost matching alternate is picked regardless of its length. Thus, if one of the alternates is a prefix of a later alternate, the latter may not have a chance to match.
(pregexp-match "call|call-with-current-continuation" "call-with-current-continuation") => ("call") |
To allow the longer alternate to have a shot at matching, place it before the shorter one:
(pregexp-match "call-with-current-continuation|call" "call-with-current-continuation") => ("call-with-current-continuation") |
In any case, an overall match for the entire regexp is always preferred to an overall nonmatch. In the following, the longer alternate still wins, because its preferred shorter prefix fails to yield an overall match.
(pregexp-match "(?:call|call-with-current-continuation) constrained" "call-with-current-continuation constrained") => ("call-with-current-continuation constrained") |
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
We've already seen that greedy quantifiers match the maximal number of times, but the overriding priority is that the overall match succeed. Consider
(pregexp-match "a*a" "aaaa") |
The regexp consists of two subregexps,
a*
followed by a
.
The subregexp a*
cannot be allowed to match
all four a
's in the text string "aaaa"
, even though
*
is a greedy quantifier. It may match only the first
three, leaving the last one for the second subregexp.
This ensures that the full regexp matches successfully.
The regexp matcher accomplishes this via a process
called backtracking. The matcher
tentatively allows the greedy quantifier
to match all four a
's, but then when it becomes
clear that the overall match is in jeopardy, it
backtracks to a less greedy match of
three a
's. If even this fails, as in the
call
(pregexp-match "a*aa" "aaaa") |
the matcher backtracks even further. Overall failure is conceded only when all possible backtracking has been tried with no success.
Backtracking is not restricted to greedy quantifiers. Nongreedy quantifiers match as few instances as possible, and progressively backtrack to more and more instances in order to attain an overall match. There is backtracking in alternation too, as the more rightward alternates are tried when locally successful leftward ones fail to yield an overall match.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Sometimes it is efficient to disable backtracking. For example, we may
wish to commit to a choice, or we know that trying alternatives
is fruitless. A nonbacktracking regexp is enclosed in
(?>
...)
.
(pregexp-match "(?>a+)." "aaaa") => #f |
In this call, the subregexp ?>a*
greedily matches
all four a
's, and is denied the opportunity to
backpedal. So the overall match is denied. The effect
of the regexp is therefore to match one or more a
's
followed by something that is definitely non-a
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
You can have assertions in your pattern that look
ahead or behind to ensure that a subpattern does
or does not occur. These "look around" assertions are
specified by putting the subpattern checked for in a
cluster whose leading characters are: ?=
(for positive
lookahead), ?!
(negative lookahead), ?<=
(positive lookbehind), ?<!
(negative lookbehind).
Note that the subpattern in the assertion does not
generate a match in the final result. It merely allows
or disallows the rest of the match.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Positive lookahead (?=
) peeks ahead to ensure that its subpattern
could match.
(pregexp-match-positions "grey(?=hound)" "i left my grey socks at the greyhound") => ((28 . 32)) |
The regexp "grey(?=hound)"
matches grey
, but
only if it is followed by hound
. Thus, the first
grey
in the text string is not matched.
Negative lookahead (?!
) peeks ahead
to ensure that its subpattern could not possibly match.
(pregexp-match-positions "grey(?!hound)" "the gray greyhound ate the grey socks") => ((27 . 31)) |
The regexp "grey(?!hound)"
matches grey
, but
only if it is not followed by hound
. Thus
the grey
just before socks
is matched.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Positive lookbehind (?<=
) checks that its subpattern could
match immediately to the left of the current position in the text
string.
(pregexp-match-positions "(?<=grey)hound" "the hound in the picture is not a greyhound") => ((38 . 43)) |
The regexp (?<=grey)hound
matches hound
, but only if it is
preceded by grey
.
Negative lookbehind
(?<!
) checks that its subpattern
could not possibly match immediately to the left.
(pregexp-match-positions "(? |
The regexp (?<!grey)hound
matches hound
, but only if
it is not preceded by grey
.
Lookaheads and lookbehinds can be convenient when they are not confusing.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Here's an extended example from Friedl
[Mastering Regular
Expressions, p123] that covers
many of the features described above. The problem is to fashion a
regexp that will match any and only IP addresses or dotted quads,
ie, four numbers separated by three dots, with each number between 0 and
255. We will use the commenting mechanism to build the final regexp
with clarity. First, a subregexp n0-255
that matches 0 through
255.
(define n0-255 "(?x: \\d ; 0 through 9 | \\d\\d ; 00 through 99 | [01]\\d\\d ;000 through 199 | 2[0-4]\\d ;200 through 249 | 25[0-5] ;250 through 255 )") |
The first two alternates simply get all single- and double-digit numbers. Since 0-padding is allowed, we need to match both 1 and 01. We need to be careful when getting 3-digit numbers, since numbers above 255 must be excluded. So we fashion alternates to get 000 through 199, then 200 through 249, and finally 250 through 255.(10)
An IP-address is a string that consists of
four n0-255
s with three dots separating
them.
(define ip-re1 (string-append "^" ;nothing before n0-255 ;the first n0-255, "(?x:" ;then the subpattern of "\\." ;a dot followed by n0-255 ;an n0-255, ")" ;which is "{3}" ;repeated exactly 3 times "$" ;with nothing following )) |
Let's try it out.
(pregexp-match ip-re1 "1.2.3.4") => ("1.2.3.4") (pregexp-match ip-re1 "55.155.255.265") => #f |
which is fine, except that we also have
(pregexp-match ip-re1 "0.00.000.00") => ("0.00.000.00") |
All-zero sequences are not valid IP addresses!
Lookahead to the rescue. Before starting to match
ip-re1
, we look ahead to ensure we don't have all
zeros. We could use positive lookahead
to ensure there is a digit other than
zero.
(define ip-re (string-append "(?=.*[1-9])" ;ensure there's a non-0 digit ip-re1)) |
Or we could use negative lookahead to ensure that what's ahead isn't composed of only zeros and dots.
(define ip-re (string-append "(?![0.]*$)" ;not just zeros and dots ;(note: dot is not metachar inside []) ip-re1)) |
The regexp ip-re
will match
all and only valid IP addresses.
(pregexp-match ip-re "1.2.3.4") => ("1.2.3.4") (pregexp-match ip-re "0.0.0.0") => #f |
[ << ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |